galathea: (s/d batcave)
galathea ([personal profile] galathea) wrote2013-07-23 01:16 pm
Entry tags:

SDCC 2013 | S9 Spoilers | Some General Thoughts

I guess most of you will have seen the panels and reports from Comic Con by now, so what are your thoughts? Personally, I could not say that I am particularly happy with the information Carver & Co released about S9 so far, but that does not really come as a surprise to me.



So, Comic Con came and went, and it was surprisingly uninformative. Carver & Co did not reveal much about S9 we did not already know or concluded from the events of the season finale. I guess I should count it as a win that, rather than leaving me in a state of misery and despair, the spoilers from Comic Con only resulted in quiet resignation on my part. As expected, the spoilers divulged nothing that would get me excited for S9. The idea of suffering through a season that, once again, has its main focus on angels and demons is absolutely unappealing to me, and I really could not care less about the woes of Metatron, Castiel and Crowley. Obviously, the spoiler most relevant to my interests was the reveal that the way Sam heals from his trial-related illness involves a big secret between the brothers that Sam is not aware of and that Dean keeps from him – a secret that will, no doubt, create yet another rift between the brothers when it comes to light – and words cannot describe how tired I am of this narrative device to create conflict between the brothers. It is entirely contrived at this point in the show, and worse, it makes a mockery of past growth in the brotherly relationship. I wished I could say that I expected better, but fact is that this is exactly the kind of repetitive and unimaginative plotting I came to expect from the current creative team.

Now, Dean keeping yet another secret from Sam would be upsetting in and of itself, but it is even more disconcerting coming on the heels of the S8 finale, in which Sam broke down and openly showed Dean how much it hurts him when Dean does not trust him. Dean seemed genuinely shocked and distressed by Sam’s confession, clearly unaware of how deeply his brother is affected by his words and actions. So, the fact that his reaction to Sam’s hurt is to turn around and lie to him – no matter how good his intentions may be – is just a slap in Sam’s face. Moreover, the fact that Sam’s choice and control over his life/body are taken away from him, again, by keeping him in the dark about what is happening to him is unsettling. It is also rather frustrating that Dean once again has double standards when it comes to him and Sam. I mean, in Goodbye Stranger he emphasised to Sam how tired he is of being lied to by the people closest to him, and yet he has no problem doing the same to his brother. Not that this is news, but after eight years this kind of behaviour has just become tiresome.

Another information that left me quite frustrated was Jensen’s statement that, so far, he is under the impression that the writers did not plan out a distinct character arc for Dean; they rather try different things with the character and see what will stick. Jensen’s statement plays into my perception that, instead of carefully planning a season as a whole, Carver & Co just do whatever pops into their minds and that seems cool at any given moment, regardless of continuity or consistency. Well, at least that is how S8 came off to me. With that in mind, I do not have any confidence that the writers have any well thought-out plans in store for Sam’s long-term character arc or the mythology either. All in all, my motivation to watch S9 is at an all-time low at the moment, and I am not sure that will change in the next three months. Maybe I will just have to accept that my time with the show has come to an end, even though I am still emotionally invested in the characters. I guess I will have to wait and see.

[identity profile] bowtrunckle.livejournal.com 2013-07-24 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Hello brain twin!

I was just contemplating writing up my thoughts about S9 based on spoilers, but then (before reading this) decided that I didn't care enough to do so. :( The fact that SPN-related stuff, even if it's bothersome, fails to elicit more than a "ho-hum, ugh, *headdesk*" response from me just shows how underwhelmed I am and the degree of my detachment. :(

I'm finally admitting to myself that I do not care about angels or Crowley. And for me the most compelling angel isn't Cas, but was Namoi, who won't be returning in any way shape or form (confirmed at SDCC)--not that I was really holding out too much hope, though. But at least I'm not in denial anymore about the fact that angels and Crowley do not interest me, right?

Ditto regarding your thoughts on Sam and Dean and secrets and the potential for character "regression" and strange double standards. I'm hopeful that whatever pans out with "the secret" is cool and clever and makes sense because JP seems to be so excited about it.

Another information that left me quite frustrated was Jensen’s statement that, so far, he is under the impression that the writers did not plan out a distinct character arc for Dean

I groaned out loud when those words came out of Jensen's mouth. Just. Ugh. Show. Do not waste my time. I feel like this is what happens during the first season of a TV show and it shouldn't be happening to this degree with an established show with characters who have a HUGE history that has played out onscreen right in front of the audiences' eyes. Part of me wonders if I should be slightly insulted and wondering if Carver and Co. think that either we're going to discount or "forget" years of Winchester characterization/story telling or if they're that arrogant to think that they can just conveniently ignore most of what has come before. Or maybe it's just that they don't know what else to do so they're just doing a bunch of things (again) to see what the audience likes *groan*. My biggest pet peeve is lack of vision in story telling and a meandering, nonsensical story with weird dead ends and an unsatisfying ending. And so far there's not much that's dispelling my worry that S9 is veering in that direction and, worse, will be filled with too many fan-service!angels and fan-service!Crowley. :(
Edited 2013-07-24 05:11 (UTC)

[identity profile] llywela13.livejournal.com 2013-07-24 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey Chris. I'm very out of touch - and getting more so by the week, it seems. The above all sounds horribly unappealing and mostly only serves to remind me of all the reasons I became dissaffected from the show in the first place - but I feel really bad for you because you still care and I want a good season for your sake!

It's sad to think that 12 months ago I was still watching and still reasonably optimistic, no longer as invested as I once was, but still. And then in such a short time that lingering investment was just killed stone dead. The show really has lost its way, forgotten what it used to be about - and, worse, forgotten how to tread new ground. Or possibly ceased being brave enough to tread new ground. So instead it goes around the same stagnant circles, grinding the characters into dust. It really sounds as if the current production team has no true vision for the show at all. All they have is a stale formula and an ear for the loudest and least critical voices in fandom. When I think what it once was...but we'll never have that back now.